Essay On Terrorism Has No Religion

Essay On Terrorism Has No Religion-29
This is stated in the Quran, the holy book of Muslims. You shall not kill — GOD has made life sacred — except in the course of justice.

For example on Friday, well-known Australian Anglican priest Father Rod Bower tweeted: “From Christ Church Gosford to #Christchurch New Zealand.

/* Load GPT asynchronously */var googletag = googletag || ;= || [];(function() )();push( function() { window.

It wasn’t until a couple of hours later that the Australian and New Zealand prime ministers publicly referred to the shootings as terrorist attacks.“It is clear that this can now only be described as a terrorist attack,” Ardern said.

“These are people who I would describe as having extremist views that have absolutely no place in New Zealand.”Other countries who were among the first to do the same were Indonesia, Pakistan and Turkey, with Jakarta having the closest relative proximity to New Zealand.

At times to sensationalise primetime shows, analysts espousing far-right views are given space to make insinuations about Muslims and immigrants.

The irony is also completely lost upon the world that one of the words that ‘Islam’ derives from is ‘salaam’ which means ‘peace’, whereas Islam has been associated with violence by people with political agendas.Even in what has become common language, certain Christians with dreams of institutionalising their religion are called ‘evangelicals’ with no mention of Christianity, while Muslims are referred to as ‘Islamists’, with their religion implicated in the term.When the perpetrators of such terror attacks turn out to be Muslims, it becomes common among journalists and TV anchors to use terms like ‘Islamic terror’, ‘Islamic fundamentalism’ and ‘pan-Islamism’ and spend a lot of air time holding debates about the dangers of what many describe as an ‘Islamic Caliphate’.With bated breath, Muslim communities around the world waited to hear how Friday’s mass shootings in Christchurch, New Zealand, would be characterised.Initially, New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern condemned it as “one of New Zealand’s darkest days”, and “an extraordinary and unprecedented act of violence”.No religion should come under attack as a result of violence committed by its adherents, but why has the term “Islamic terrorist” been normalised?Has this become a form of psychological warfare from the echelons of power, in an attempt to create some form of word recognition associating Islam with terrorism, without implicating anyone else in identical situations?In this case, one of the shooters, Brenton Tarrant, has not been referred to as a “white terrorist” or a “Christian terrorist”, even though his detailed 74-page manifesto has clear racial and religious references.He wrote a specific message “To Turks." In it, he said: “You can live in peace in your own lands, and may no harm come to you. But if you attempt to live in European lands, anywhere west of the Bosphorus.This is not who we are.”At least 49 people were killed in attacks on two mosques in the coastal New Zealand city of Christchurch, including one mosque’s imam, with around 20 others injured.They had gathered for the weekly Friday congregational prayer.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Essay On Terrorism Has No Religion

The Latest from my-trafic.ru ©