Tannen deems quite successful in making the audience feel how she wants them to feel–relieved.Tannen successfully uses various pathos and logos techniques to stir up the reader’s emotions in the essay, “Sex, Lies, and Conversation.”Divorce is a truly harsh thing.Why the widespread imbalance of their interests and expectations?
Tannen deems quite successful in making the audience feel how she wants them to feel–relieved.Tannen successfully uses various pathos and logos techniques to stir up the reader’s emotions in the essay, “Sex, Lies, and Conversation.”Divorce is a truly harsh thing.Why the widespread imbalance of their interests and expectations?Tags: Research Paper On BankingWayne State University Critical Thinking CoursesEssay School Holiday SpmTerm Paper ThemesWrite My Essay NowDissertation Argumentative IntroDissertation DefenceEssay Paragraph ConnectorsNhs Essay IdeasArt History Research Paper Topics
The reader now feels these and wonders if “wreaking havoc” in relationships is what he or she might have been doing for so long and never coming to realize it.
Tannen later asks the questions, “How can women and men have such different impressions of communication in marriage?
Louann Brizandine, in a 24 hour period, the average man will speak anywhere from 7000-10,000 words, whereas a woman can speak anywhere from 20,000-24,000 words.
Thousands upon thousands of words are thrown out of the human brains, but how many of those are truly understood? In Deborah Tannen’s essay, “Sex, Lies, and Conversation,” pathos and logos are dropped in bombshells in order for the reader to feel accessible to such information.
The once beautiful joining of two people in marriage over time decays into nothing but a bitter carcass of what they used to call happiness.
Nobody will necessarily agree that America’s 50% divorce rate is a good statistic.Because of humans’ desires for happiness, reading the essay will slowly but surely shake up a few of the most persuasive emotions: happiness, guilt, and relief.A married man might be having trouble with communication is his marriage, so upon research for a cure, he might stumble upon Tannen’s essay, causing him to feel all three emotions.And this pattern is wreaking havoc with marriage” (503).The pathos in those two sentences stands very tall, causing a bit of fear and guilt.The pathos in this essay mostly stirs the inner desire for a happy marriage; she simply makes the male or female reader feel like they too have misinterpreted the opposite sex.Suddenly, the reader might feel guilty, but then relieved when Tannen displays the solution.Tannen says, “He gestured toward his wife and said, ‘She’s the talker in our family.’ The room burt into laughter; the man looked puzzled and hurt. This example subliminally questions the audience into wondering if the same case might be applicable in their lives.She goes on to say, “This episode crystallizes the irony that although American men tend to talk more than women in public situations, they often talk less and home.The name “political scientist Andrew Hacker” sounds official and business-like, as if the man must know what he is talking about.In the sentence immediately thereafter, a not-so-famous “sociologist Catherine Kohler” gets thrown on the table.