In his 1997 exhortation to the environmental ministers at Kyoto, Vice President Al Gore warned that “disease and pests [are, will be?
The idea is to decrease this process by 5.2 % according to the data form 10 years before.
Compared to the emissions levels that would be expected by 2010 without the Protocol, this target represents a 29% cut. China has pledged to use 15 % renewable energy by 2020 and plant 40m hectares of new forest.
A significant short-term decline in such actions could have adverse health repercussions.
The optimal approach to dealing with [the] prospect of climate change would (a) include improvement of health infrastructures (especially in developing countries) and (b) exclude any measures that would impair economies and limit public health resources.
President Clinton has asserted: “Disruptive weather events are increasing.
Disease-bearing insects are moving to areas that used to be too cold for them. Glacial formations are receding” (address at the National Geographic Society, October 22, 1997). Introduction Anna Palgan Olivier Gubis Geography HL, 11 grade 27/02/2012 The Kyoto Protocol The Kyoto Protocol is an agreement between industrialised countries in which they agree to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases by 5.2 % for the period 2008-2012, according to the data collected in 1997.The reference point of the challenge is very important.1996; Kalkstein 1991, 1992; Kalkstein and Davis 1989; Epstein et al. This analysis will explore whether Americans do indeed confront a health crisis.If global warming were to occur, would the United States face an epidemic of tropical diseases, malaria being the prime suspect; would Americans face increased heatstroke and summers that brought a surge of deaths; would global warming bring more frequent and more violent hurricanes wreaking havoc on our citizens?After examining the potential impact of global warming on poor countries, the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) took a realistic view and reported that Nearly all of the potential adverse health effects of projected climate change are significant, real-life problems that have long persisted under stable climatic conditions.Bolstering efforts to eliminate or alleviate such problems would both decrease the current incidence of premature death and facilitate dealing with the health risks of any climate change that might occur.The projected impacts range from increased incidence of illness and death due to heat stress and deteriorating air quality, to the rise in transmission rates of deadly infectious diseases such as malaria, dengue fever, and hanta virus” (Other environmentalists and health experts have also forecast that global warming would bring death and disease (Danzig 1995; IPCC 1996a; Jackson 1995; Epstein and Gelbspan 1995; Cromie 1995; Stone 1995; Monastersky 1994; Patz et al.Policies that weaken economies tend to weaken public health programs.Thus, it is likely that implementation of such policies would (a) increase the risk of premature death and (b) exacerbate any adverse health effects of future climate change.