Consult the examples below for suggestions on how to look for patterns in your evidence and construct a purpose statement.
Franco’s role in the diplomatic relationships between the Allies and the Axis To find out what your “controlling idea” is, you have to examine and evaluate your evidence.
This point, the “controlling idea,” becomes the core of your argument (thesis statement) and it is the unifying idea to which you will relate all your sub-theses.
You can then turn this “controlling idea” into a purpose statement about what you intend to do in your paper.
You may instead decide to focus on Franco’s role in the diplomatic relationships between the Allies and the Axis, which narrows down what aspects of Spain’s neutrality and World War II you want to discuss, as well as establishes a specific link between those two aspects.
Coffee Distribution Business Plan - Qualify Thesis Statements
Before you go too far, however, ask yourself whether your topic is worthy of your efforts.
Try to avoid topics that already have too much written about them (i.e., “eating disorders and body image among adolescent women”) or that simply are not important (i.e. These topics may lead to a thesis that is either dry fact or a weird claim that cannot be supported.
A good thesis falls somewhere between the two extremes.
Doing so will also make me appear far less dogmatic; we tend not to trust (ethos) those entirely devoted to a single perspective in any debate where there are clearly competing perspectives.
I mean, if you cant see even part of why your opposition believes what they do, its highly unlikely this opposition will ever come over to your side of the argument.