Aim: To study the practice of postgraduate students of MD pathology in the use of titles for their dissertation.Tags: Ideas For A Argumentative EssayLewis And Clark Research PaperConservation Of Energy EssayMichael Parker Doppelganger EssayStarting A Car Rental Business PlanEssays Othello A Tragic HeroTips For Writing Amcas Personal Statement
” Female Bodies as Sites of Resistance in the Three Stories of Postcolonial Author Mahasweta Devi Chen, Chao-Ying (2018) Droplet Spreading on a Substrate Cheng, Jian (2018) Evaluation of Economic Improvement in United States and China Pork Industry Through Modeling and Genetic Tools Cheng, Yichuan (2018) U.
Correspondence Address: Ravi V Shirahatti Department of Public Health Dentistry, Maratha Mandal's Nathajirao G Halgekar Institute of Dental Sciences and Research center, Belagavi, Karnataka India Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None Context: There is a need to evaluate the quality of postgraduate dissertations of dentistry submitted to university in the light of the international standards of reporting.
Aims: We conducted the review with an objective to document the use of sampling methods, measurement standardization, blinding, methods to eliminate bias, appropriate use of statistical tests, appropriate use of data presentation in postgraduate dental research and suggest and recommend modifications.
Settings and Design: The public access database of the dissertations from Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences was reviewed.
Disciplines oral surgery (80%) and periodontics (67%) had conducted experimental studies as a major share of their research.
Lacunae in the studies included observational studies not following random sampling (70%), experimental studies not following random allocation (75%), not mentioning about blinding, confounding variables and calibrations in measurements, misrepresenting the data by inappropriate data presentation, errors in reporting probability values and not reporting confidence intervals.
Subjects and Methods: Three hundred and thirty-three eligible dissertations underwent preliminary evaluation followed by detailed evaluation of 10% of randomly selected dissertations.
The dissertations were assessed based on international reporting guidelines such as strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE), consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT), and other scholarly resources.
var modal_data_from_div = ""; //Load modal body content from existing div id or class.
var modal_data_from_var = ""; //Load modal body content from variable.